| | Sunday, September 22, 2002 - 09:30 am I have an 87GN with a TA49,009's,XP fuel pump,adj. FP reg.,ATR Cold air intake,3in TH DP,and i am running a Red's 93 chip (tailored for my combo of course). Im using Turbolink to tune it, but i cant get the 02 readings to drop below 890 at WOT. I can drop the fuel pressure to as low as 38 psi(vaccume off) and it still has little to no effect on the readings. A local GN guru suggested this is a problem with the chip commanding too much fuel to the injectors. Is that a possibility? If not, what else should I look for to fix this? Thanks, Bill Ritter
|
| | Monday, September 23, 2002 - 09:46 am How much boost? Are you seeing retard? If not, then start upping the boost carefully. If it's still too rich, then the chip probably needs some fuel taken out of it.
|
| | Monday, September 23, 2002 - 02:59 pm Yes i am seeing retard. I tried to chase the fuel with boost to lean it out. At 17psi of boost i am seeing 7.8 degrees of knock retard. that's as far as i dare to go. I will give Quad Air a call tomorrow. Thanks Ken!
|
| | Monday, September 23, 2002 - 03:44 pm Help! Here I go again. I need help understanding Bill and Ken's last post. I thought retard was caused by a too lean condition, which causes knock, which causes retard because the knock sensor hears the knock and sends a signal to the ECM to retard until the knock disappears. I thought if you add boost, you are adding more air which makes it even leaner which will result in more knock. I always thought you had to raise the amount of fuel and/or add octane to get rid of knock without causing retard. Where am I going wrong here? Is it the o2 count? Thanks
|
| | Tuesday, September 24, 2002 - 04:28 am If you have 17psi of boost and 7.8 knock retard bring your arm out 1/2-1 turn you are about at the limit. If you want to add more boost safely race gas or alky system is the way to go.
|
| | Tuesday, September 24, 2002 - 02:49 pm Carl Ijames posted to the mailing list:
|
| | Wednesday, September 25, 2002 - 03:20 am Thanks Ken and Carl! It's obvious I still have a lot to learn. I never realized that running too rich also causes knock. I always thought the only thing caused by a too rich condition was a lot of smoke and washing oil off the cylinder walls which eventually causes ring wear. I thought I understood the elevated o2s because I thought that was caused by the unburned gas or dirty exhaust. Can someone add some more info about what happens in the cylinder when you have a too rich knock? At what f/a ratio do bad things happen? As I loosely interperate Carl's post, 13.5-13.9 is good, 14.0-14.2 borderline lean, 14.3 mild lean knock, and 14.5+ severe lean knock. Conversly,13.2-13.4 borderline rich, 13.1 mild rich knock, and below 13.0 severe rich knock. Carl, is what you're saying, when you are too rich, the o2 sensor does not pull out fuel through the ECM. It is the knock sensor retarding spark because of rich knock? I guess because my car is in such good tune all the time, I've never experienced this condition. Thanks in advance!
|
| | Wednesday, September 25, 2002 - 02:04 pm Well, the A/F ratio depends on engine load, temps, etc. Under boost, the car runs richer (~12.5:1), due to the fact that the cylinder pressures are high (as are EGT) and the extra fuel is keeping things cooler. Richer than that (11.5:1) may be required under certain cicumstances ... but too rich, and you start loosing horsepower and beyond that point you can actually induce "rich knock" ... too much fuel causing possible uncontrolled burn. The O2 sensor is not really used much for WOT fueling corrections (as in not at all) ... thus, the ECM doesn't try to guess whether it's rich or lean knock. It just sees an EST event that indicates knock and retards the timing according to the chip parameters (and adds timing back in at the recovery rate).
|
| | Wednesday, September 25, 2002 - 02:30 pm Ken, Thanks! It's starting to make sense now. Is there a logic tree, in the archives somewhere, where I can follow the function of the sensors under WOT? The idle circuit is pretty well known to me, but I'm still not comfortable with how everything all works together when you're kickin' bootie. Thanks for sharing your knowledge. Knowlegable people like you make the GN family fun. I can only imagine what it would be like for us newbies without you guys.
|
| | Thursday, September 26, 2002 - 02:40 pm Try downloading the TurboLink manual at: http://www.turbo-link.com and go to UPGRADES. It's PDF, so you'll need Adobe Acrobat. Read section 8 (all the sensor nominal values and functions) and "Tuning with TurboLink" section. That ought to get a few questions answered (and maybe spark a few more too! )
|
| | Thursday, September 26, 2002 - 02:48 pm Posted Carl's response from the mailing list (hey Carl, over hear! On the BBS!)
|
| | Wednesday, October 23, 2002 - 10:53 am My car is also running pretty rich right now. It is an 86 GN and my setup is 9" K/N, Walbro 307 with Hotwire, adjustable FPR set at 40lbs at idle with vacuum line off (32lbs with vacuum connected), PTE Delphi 37lb injectors with matching 93 octane chip with 20 deg timing, boost set at 18lbs, stock manifolds with no leaks and a 2 1/2 inch Flowmaster catback system. I dont have a scantool (Turbo Link is ordered and on the way) so I haven't made any adjustments. My biggest problem right now is with a backfire (from intake) when under acceleration. The car seems to run fine....idles smooth, drives nice. It only happens when I get on it hard or even when slowly getting into it and boost builds to around 10lbs. Fuel pressure is good, all new components, new plugs CR43TS set at a tight .035, new wires, new O2 sensor....Any ideas?
|
| | Wednesday, October 23, 2002 - 12:29 pm Taken directly from my Trouble Diagnosis Manual; Engine backfires; Intermittent fuel supply, dirt or water in system. Stuck intake valve. Improper timing. Moisture in coil boots. Flat lobe on camshaft. My own thoughts; Sticky injector/s. Worn valve spring/s. FPR set too high.
|