This is a general site search and does not include list archives. | |||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Turbolink compare to the snap-on MT-2500? (split from Scan Tool Comparison Chart)
How does the turbolink compare to the snap-on MT-2500?
Only need info for Gm vehicles true 2000. May be let me re-fraise the question How does it compare to the snap-on MT-2500 based on the GM vehicles that the turbolink supports. Example The amount of accurate info when scanning a 1994 Chevy suburban 5.7 VIN=K
__________________
New best 11.74 @ 114 1968 LC2 Powered Chevelle - David Husek built ENGINE and TRANSMISSION My Chevelle build-up Last edited by turbopowered68; 07-18-2007 at 07:38 AM. Reason: more info |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Turbolink compare to the snap-on MT-2500? (split from Scan Tool Comparison Chart)
Have you used the snap on MT-2000?
It doesn't show very much for these engines (I have 84 ECM) Hot Air Car! I use It an a MAC (don't remember model) for most of the trouble code issues, The MAC only work in Diagnostic Mode (Not good for driving) and no ROADMode. The Snap on unit can only show 4 rows of data without having to roll the display to see the remaining data info.. You can see O2,Knock, Timing retard from one screen. It's got a LCD Screen. I didn't see it had a log function, snap-shot yes 1 frame like freeze frame. Here is a link to Turbo link info. http://www.turbo-link.com/tlink/asp/wiz_all.asp
__________________
Stan Schackow 84 T-Type 00 WS6 Trans Am 78 SS/KA Trans Am 06 G6 GTP |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|