GN and T-Type Performance Enthusiasts (GNTTYPE) Forums GN and T-Type Performance Enthusiasts (GNTTYPE) Forums
This is a general site search and does not include list archives.

Go Back   GN and T-Type Performance Enthusiasts (GNTTYPE) Forums > Technical Topics > Suspension/Rear Ends

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2005, 10:20 AM
Superpowers455 Superpowers455 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2
Superpowers455 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to Superpowers455
Default Buick Grand National Rear Axles

Good morning,
I just bought a 1984 Buick T-type Regal 10-bolt 8.5" posi rear ($500) w/3.42:1 gears.

My question is this;
Are the axles in Turbo Regals stronger/different from all other 10-bolt 8.5" posi rear axles? Additionally, Are the lower control arms any different (the ones off the '84 T-type had/has steel braces in them)? I am also in need of knowing what type posi unit came "stock" in the turbo Buick Regals.

Thanks much.
Please feel free to E-mail any info;
Superpowers20@Hotmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2005, 10:34 AM
Turbobuick Turbobuick is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26
Turbobuick is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Buick Grand National Rear Axles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superpowers455
Good morning,
I just bought a 1984 Buick T-type Regal 10-bolt 8.5" posi rear ($500) w/3.42:1 gears.

My question is this;
Are the axles in Turbo Regals stronger/different from all other 10-bolt 8.5" posi rear axles? Additionally, Are the lower control arms any different (the ones off the '84 T-type had/has steel braces in them)? I am also in need of knowing what type posi unit came "stock" in the turbo Buick Regals.

Thanks much.
Please feel free to E-mail any info;
Superpowers20@Hotmail.com
The axles are 28 spline and are stronger than the 7.5 rears which I believe are 26 or 27 spline. The control arms and everything else in the suspension is same, the steel braces were likely thje support for the swap bar. The stock posi is a 28 spline unit. The # of splines on a axle are one of the ways to determine its strength.

BTW later model 8.5 rears in S10's came with 30 spline axles and carriers which is even stronger than the stock GN unit. I would only consider this if yours wasn't a posi or you were updating.
__________________
Chris Lyons
87 GN
8.74@157 GN1 heads, PT88, 28x10.5 tires stock suspension
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2005, 10:29 PM
Keller's Avatar
Keller Keller is offline
GNTTYPE Founder
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 9,424
Keller is on a distinguished road
Question Re: Buick Grand National Rear Axles

The 7.5" are 26 spline.

Any indication of what year S10's are the proper ones for the 30 spline carriers, and are they a direct swap (with correct axles, of course) in the G-body carrier?

It is possible that someone may have welded extra bracing in those lower control arms as well.
__________________
Scott Keller - GNTTYPE Founder & Moderator
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-07-2005, 08:56 AM
Doc Doc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68
Doc is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Buick Grand National Rear Axles

Regarding the S-10 axle, it would have to be a quite recent model. I had a '90 S-10 4x4 with the 4.3L V6 and it had the 7.5" rear end with 26 spline axles. I am pretty sure that the 7.5" was used in the S-10 until 92 or 93 perhaps...maybe even later.

I would think that the easiest upgrade would be to get some aftermarket axle shafts, such as Moser or Strange. They are not that expensive and despite being the stock 26 spline, would probably be stronger than the S-10 30 spline axles. Plus, you KNOW they would be a drop-in part with no fiddling required.

If you are buying an aftermarket posi, many of them are available with higher spline counts too. So, you could always swap in the bigger axles and a new aftermarket posi at the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2005, 09:47 AM
Keller's Avatar
Keller Keller is offline
GNTTYPE Founder
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 9,424
Keller is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb Re: Buick Grand National Rear Axles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superpowers455
I am also in need of knowing what type posi unit came "stock" in the turbo Buick Regals.
Its an Eaton, which is a disc type, and is rebuildable. Unlike the 'cone' types, which are really not. There were a few years where I believe you could not get the Eaton's in the aftermarket.

http://www.traction.eaton.com/

The TR rear is the same as the 442 rear of the same vintage, save for the 442's have 3.73 gears.

I figure it'd be cheaper to go junkyard diving and grab an Eaton center out of the proper year S10 (if it fits) and rebuild it than spend ~$400 on a new one. For that money I could pick up a set of Moser axles to stuff in the sides, and almost scratch my head about C-clip eliminators to boot.
__________________
Scott Keller - GNTTYPE Founder & Moderator
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2005, 09:55 AM
Doc Doc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68
Doc is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Buick Grand National Rear Axles

I am aware that the cone-type posis are generally not rebuildable. However, Eaton claims that they have a higher bias force than the disc type posis used in OEM appliations. Am I correct in assuming that means that they offer a greater resistance to wheelspin?

The Eaton cone posi has (if I remember right) a 3 year warranty, which does cover rebuilds.

Even if I only get 3 years out of it, $400 for better traction doesn't seem like a bad deal to me.

Has anyone done a side-by-side comparison of the cone posi vs. the disc type? I'd like to see more than just advertising hype.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-07-2005, 11:34 AM
Keller's Avatar
Keller Keller is offline
GNTTYPE Founder
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 9,424
Keller is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Re: Buick Grand National Rear Axles

Check out the link I posted. The Eatons are not cones. Many Auburn rears are cone types.
__________________
Scott Keller - GNTTYPE Founder & Moderator
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-07-2005, 12:41 PM
Turbobuick Turbobuick is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26
Turbobuick is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Buick Grand National Rear Axles

I believe 89 and newer GM 8.5" rearends will have a 30 spline center section. The axles will all be different but 30 spine Mosers are not that expensive and are going to be much better than GM anyway. Then there is always the Eaton which is a nice unit.
__________________
Chris Lyons
87 GN
8.74@157 GN1 heads, PT88, 28x10.5 tires stock suspension
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:21 PM
Doc Doc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68
Doc is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Buick Grand National Rear Axles

Thanks for the correction. I had a brain fart...I was indeed talking about the Auburn cone-type LSD, not the Eaton.

The makers of posis love to throw around words like "torque sensing". Ever looked at the inside of a posi? Where is the torque sensor? There isn't one. This kind of description is just a fancy way of describing (marketing) some basic physics that is occuring inside the posi.

Let's talk about open diffs for a moment. We all know the example where you've got one tire without traction (in the mud/snow/puddle/whatever) and one tire with traction (on good pavement)....the slipping tire contiunes to spin while very little torque is being applied to the "good" tire. Note that there is actually SOME torque that is applied to the "good" tire. (If there wasn't any power going there at all, then every car would get stuck in the slightest little puddle or slick spot on the road). In and open diff, what little torque is available comes from the friction and drag that is latent in the axle assembly and the diff. Needless to say this is pretty low, but it is good enough for most cars on average street conditions.

Enter the posi. Posi is of course a trade name for a limited slip diff. A posi has design features that increase this torque available at the good tire. However, it is still possible for a posi to slip. It just means that for slip to occur, this increased torque must first be delivered.

Let me better explain what I was talking about. Functionally, a cone-type posi and a disc posi work the same way. The internal springs in the posi are preloading a set of clutches. In the Eaton, it is a disc type clutch. In the Auburn, it is a cone clutch. These clutches are what resist "differentiation" and slip. And in either case, a posi is basically an open diff with either kind of clutch added to it.

The clutches in a posi provide a certain minimum amount of torque to overcome. Given enough of a difference in torque between the two wheels it will eventually slip. This happens every time you drive around a curve or corner. However, whereas the latent friction in an open diff provides very little torque at the good tire in a slip situation, a posi will provide more.

Now, in the above paragraph I lied a little bit. In addition to the "static preload" of the clutches, there is also another factor. That is basically a percentage of the input torque (bias). This percentage is a design factor of the Posi. But the rule still holds: In order for it to "slip", the torque difference must exceed the holding power of the clutches. It is therefore the stength of the clutches (preload and bias) that determines just how effective a given posi is at resisting wheelspin.

Let's do an example. (I'm just going to be making up numbers here)

Suppose we've got a car, and one rear wheel is on an oily slick and has zero traction. The other is on good pavement and has excellent traction.

An open diff has a little resistance to slip. Maybe 25 ft-lb could be delivered to the good wheel, regardless of the rest of the car/engine. Not good.

A stock posi would be designed to have a high preload. Maybe 200 ft-lb, and a bias factor of 0.1. In this example, it requires 300 ft-lb PLUS 0.1 x torque delivered by the engine/trans/gears in order to overcome the clutch. If we assume there's 1000 ft-lb available at the axles for a given throttle position, in this case 300 ft-lb would be available at the good wheel...clearly a lot better. But, note that even though the driveline is cranking out 1000 ft-lb, there's still only 300 MAX avaiable at the good tire...the clutch will just slip away the rest. (This is why a serious drag car will run a locker or an outright spool, becasue those will transfer 100% of torque, period. If we had a spool or a locker, there'd be all 1000 ft-lb at the good tire!)

What happens if we have a posi with a higher preload? (stronger springs, such as the Moroso Brute). This will increase the preload torque. For example, we might have 400 ft-lb plus 0.1*DT. That gives us a higher torque (500 ft-lb) at the good wheel.

What happens if we have a posi with a higher bias factor? (this would be a disc posi with more discs in it, or a cone posi with a steeper angle on the cones). This gives us a higher driveline torque factor. For example, 300 + 0.3xDT. Again, this gives us more power available at the good wheel. The higher the bias factor is, the higher the torque delivery limit is. In this case, 600 ft lb. (And the more you step on the gas, the better the performance difference between this and a standard posi)

...Basically if you raise either factor sufficently high you would have an equivalent to a spool. The higher these factors might be, the more torque the posi is capable of delivering to the good wheel in the case of a slipping condition.

Practically, it makes more sense to raise the driveline torque factor (bias). This is becasue of what happens when you turn. During normal street driving, you turn corners under low-throttle conditions. This is when the driveline torque factor falls low and the static preload becomes the governing force to overcome to ensure proper differentitation. If you had too high of static preload, then you'd be chirping tires every time you turned a corner (just like if you had a spool)--and I have heard this happen on a car running the Moroso Brute. On the other hand, if you have a posi with a relatively LOW static preload but a fairly high bias factor, turning corners is no problem, but when you romp on the pedal you get much better performance. Too high of a static preload will wear out the posi quickly.

SUPPOSEDLY, this is why a steep cone posi (Auburn) is better than a disc posi, becasue it has a higher bias. That means whenever you hit the gas hard, it becomes more "spool like" and gives you better traction than could be provided by an OEM type posi. The disadvantage, of course, is that they are unrepairable once they wear out.

I was hoping that someone had acutally used one of these, and could provide a real world comparison. This stuff all sounds great on paper (and especially in maker's literature) but nothing beats actual experience.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2005, 07:29 PM
Ormand Ormand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 103
Ormand is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Buick Grand National Rear Axles

Quote:
this is why a steep cone posi (Auburn) is better than a disc posi, becasue it has a higher bias
But, as you noted, the bias of the disc type can be increased by using more discs. Chevy recommends adding additional discs, in their factory performance manual, and many rebuilders do that, too. In addition, there is more friction surface area with the disc type than is available in the cone type. I'm not really up on the actual performance of one versus the other, but I know that there are some Eatons running on some pretty quick cars, and I know that GM kind of drifted away from the cone-type.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 AM.


This page maintained by: gnttype-webmaster@gnttype.org

The content, images, text and multimedia displayed and contributed by the members of the Grand National and T-Type Performance Enthusiasts Organization are Copyright ©1996-2005. No part, section, image, article or whole of this site may be reposted or redisplayed without permission of the author/contributor and/or the Grand National and T-Type Performance Enthusiasts Organization.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.